The assessment method consists of an oral exam.
The evaluation is expressed in thirtieths, the exam is passed if the evaluation is equal or superior to eighteen/thirty (18/30).
In determining the order in which the students are to be examined, the specific needs of working students will be specifically considered.
The assessment of insufficiency is not accompanied by a vote.
Praise may be granted unanimously, if the final grade is thirty.
The publicity of the exams is assured and the communication of the final result of the test and its evaluation are published.
For the evaluation of the oral exam, the following assessment schedule will be considered:
DATA
CONTENT: CORRECTNESS AND RELEVANCE
DESCRIPTORS:
Complete: 30
Extensive: 29-27
Discrete even with some gaps: 26-24
Fully enough: 23-21
Just enough with obvious shortcomings: 20-18
----------------------
DATA
ARGUMENTS: BREADTH AND COHERENCE
DESCRIPTORS:
Rigorous and documented highlighting ability to use the acquired knowledge and to link it in the argumentation: 30
Precise and detailed: 29-27
Appropriate: 26-24
Fully enough: 23-21
Just enough: 20-18
--------------------------
DATA
EXPRESSIVE CORRECTNESS, PROPERTY OF SCIENTIFIC
LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATIVE ABILITY
DESCRIPTORS
Refined and original: 30
Clear, flowing and correct: 29-27
Discrete: 26-24
Sufficient: 23-21
Not fully adequate: 20-18
To pass the exam you must obtain a grade of not less than 18/30.
To achieve a score of 30/30 cum laude, the student must demonstrate that he has acquired excellent knowledge of all the topics covered during the course, being able to link them in a logical and coherent way.