The verification of learning will be done by oral examination. It consists of
an interview with the teacher. The interview is aimed at evaluating the
student in the knowledge of the main concepts represented in the course
objectives of the course; in the ability to use appropriate terminology; in
the ability of critical synthesis of the topics dealt with also through the
deepening in the recommended text.
At the end of the test, the teacher will formulate an opinion expressed in
voting ranges and in marks out of thirty. The recording of the tests takes
place through an electronic procedure in accordance with the methods
indicated in Article 29 of the Administrative Careers Regulation.
Rated 30 - 30 cum laude: Excellent knowledge and understanding of the
topics, reasoning skills and logical integration of the acquired knowledge,
strong aptitude to make connections between different topics; excellent
synthesis skills e. The student, who has achieved this evaluation,
demonstrates autonomy of judgment, high communication skills and
autonomous learning skills, will be offered praise.
Rating 27 - 29: Good knowledge and understanding of the topics with
marginal and not serious gaps. Good ability to integrate logic and
judgment. Mastery of scientific language;
Rating 23 - 26: Fair knowledge and understanding of the topics
moderated in depth and, some gaps, in the ability to integrate and apply
knowledge. significant mastery of scientific language
Rating 20 - 22: Knowledge and understanding of the fully sufficient
arguments, little in-depth analysis, obvious gaps, which are reflected in a
reduced capacity for integration, logic and application. Acceptable
mastery of scientific language
Rating 18 - 19: Knowledge and understanding of the superficial
arguments and with serious and obvious gaps. Sufficient knowledge to
sustain a coherent dialogue but with poor integrative and applicative
skills, but which also allow the passing of the exam